[libav-devel] [PATCH] time: Add missing zero
remi at remlab.net
Tue Sep 9 14:21:38 CEST 2014
Le 2014-09-09 12:19, Luca Barbato a écrit :
> On 09/09/14 10:01, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> Why would it be more robust? Unless the libc is utterly broken, the
>> result will be the same. Indeed I believe glibc's sysconf() calls
>> clock_getres() internally.
> Why would be unavailable? Is it possible to disable it at runtime?
On Linux, that would mean ancient kernel.
Generally speaking, whatever.
More information about the libav-devel