[libav-devel] [PATCH] time: Add missing zero
lu_zero at gentoo.org
Tue Sep 9 11:19:46 CEST 2014
On 09/09/14 10:01, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Why would it be more robust? Unless the libc is utterly broken, the
> result will be the same. Indeed I believe glibc's sysconf() calls
> clock_getres() internally.
Why would be unavailable? Is it possible to disable it at runtime?
> pthread_once() and a clockid_t static variable are perfectly suited here.
Willing to bake a patch?
More information about the libav-devel