Ronald S. Bultje rsbultje at gmail.com
Wed May 2 17:24:21 CEST 2012


On May 2, 2012 8:04 AM, "Donald Graft" <donald.graft at cantab.net> wrote:
> At 03:49 PM 5/1/2012, you wrote:
>> I have an application that used an earlier version of libavcodec
>> (circa 2009). It relied on passing NALUs one at a time. Everything
>> worked fine as the h.264 codec signaled CODEC_CAP_TRUNCATED and I
>> I now am upgrading to libavcodec 0.7.4 and I find that
>> is no longer signaled. As an experiment I flagged it on anyway and
>> found that (under linux) the decoder still worked as it did before,
>> and it gave me correct AVC video decoding.
>> This raises two questions that I would appreciate feedback on:
>> 1. Can I rely on this behavior? If not, what would you suggest?
>> I can't use the h264 parser because I have to feed non-contiguous NALUs
>> to support my frame-accurate seeking design.
>> 2. When building libavcodec for Windows using mingw/msys (and linking
>> dynamically in my application) I get a crash when trying to use
truncated feeding.
>> Do you have any idea why it would work under linux and not under Windows?
>> Any thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
> Just a quick follow up. It turns out that it works (by luck I suppose)
> for streams with one slice per picture. If there are multiple slices,
> bluray streams, then it fails.
> I suppose I will have to package my calls to libav so that full frames
are passed.
> What I don't understand is why libav was revised the way it was, breaking
> applications.

Frame-level multi threading. You can restore old behaviour by setting
AVCodecContext.thread_count = 1 or thread_type = 0. But then you do not get

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-api/attachments/20120502/edbc123a/attachment.html>

More information about the libav-api mailing list