[libav-devel] [PATCH 1/5] Do not include intfloat_readwrite.h in avutil.h

[Diego Biurrun]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:31:30AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:51:42PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans at mansr.com>
> >> ---
> >>  libavformat/4xm.c         |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/aiffenc.c     |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/cafdec.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/ffmdec.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/ffmenc.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/flvdec.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/flvenc.c      |    2 ++
> >>  libavformat/gxfenc.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/matroskaenc.c |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/mov.c         |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/movenc.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/nuv.c         |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/rtmppkt.c     |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/rtmpproto.c   |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/soxdec.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/soxenc.c      |    1 +
> >>  libavformat/thp.c         |    1 +
> >>  libavutil/avutil.h        |    1 -
> >>  18 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > The whole 5-patch set is OK if you tested that all targets like
> > examples etc. still build, which you told me is the case.
> > So go ahead and push when you feel like it.
> 
> Do we want this in before the release?

Good question.  Since this could be called a change in behavior, it
should not be in a point release.  So it's either 0.7 or never on
the 0.7 branch IMO.

I would not mind putting it in, but I'm undecided - Reinhard?

Diego